ASEAN Community and Disaster Management Cooperation the origin, development of the Regional Cooperation and Disaster Paradigms
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research article are (1) to study development of the cooperation and paradigms of disaster management in ASEAN (2) to analyze the factors affecting the shift of disaster management paradigm in ASEAN and (3) to recommend some ways to enhance the ASEAN cooperation on disaster management among ASEAN nations. The research methodology and method applied in this study is qualitative content analysis by documentary research and descriptive analysis that the findings analyzed with concepts and theories from the literature review for answering the research aims. The researcher synthesizes the conceptual framework from the concept of disaster management, concept of institution and institution change in cooperation, concept of integration and functionalism, concept of non-traditional threat, and concept of humanitarian assistance and disaster diplomacy. This article reflects the development of ASEAN cooperation in each period which is as follows: the period of ASEAN as an association establishment and the cooperation initiative (in 1967-1978), the period of discontinuance of the cooperation because of Vietnam’s invasion of Cambodia Crisis (in 1980-1991), the period of deepening and expanding cooperation with more institutionalization after cold war (in 1992-2005), the period of the cooperation under ASEAN community and ASEAN Charter (in 2006-2015), and the present period with adapting Disaster Risk Reduction and new frameworks to more concreate implementation (2016-present). From the findings above, the researcher would like to recommend the benefit for ASEAN Community of Disaster Diplomacy, support localizing and implementing of R2P principle into ASEAN Cooperation on disaster management and emergency response in the regional, and last but not least, ASEAN Community should follow Global Framework but not leave the concept initiated by inside Community (member states).
Article Details
References
ทวิดา กมลเวชช และ นิตยา โพธิ์นอก, “หน่วยที่ 11 นโยบายสาธารณะด้านสิ่งแวดล้อมและภัยพิบัติในบริบทโลก,” ใน เอกสารการสอนชุดวิชา 82328 นโยบายสาธารณะในบริบทโลก, (นนทบุรี: สำนักพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช, 2561).
สมพร คุณวิชิต, ความรู้เบื้องต้นเกี่ยวกับการจัดการสาธารณภัยแบบเบ็ดเสร็จ, พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1, (สงขลา: ภาควิชารัฐประศาสนศาสตร์ คณะวิทยาการจัดการ มหาวิทยาลัยสงขลานครินทร์, 2561).
Amitav Acharya, “Human Security,” In Globalization of world Politics: an introduction to international relations, edited by John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, (New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Caballero-Anthony, Mely and Alistair D. B. Cook, eds., Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Framework for Action, (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2013).
Haas, Ernst B., The Obsolescence of Regional Intention Theory, (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, 1975).
Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory, (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).
Krasner, Stephen D., “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” In International Regime, edited by Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca, (NY: Cornell University Press, 1983).
Levi, Magaret, “A Model, a Method and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure, edited by Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen, “Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies,” In Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 1-39.
พรรณวดี ชัยกิจ, “นัยยะทางการทูตภัยพิบัติของญี่ปุ่นในเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้,” วารสารสหวิทยาการ 13,
ฉบับที่ 1 (ตุลาคม 2558 - มีนาคม 2559), 113-143.
De Ville, Ferdi, “The Promise of Critical Historical Institutionalism for EU Trade Policy Analysis,” Journal of Contemporary European Research 9, No. 4 (2013), 618-632.
Mitrany, David, “A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization,” International Affairs 20, No. 1 (1944), 107-109.
Nye, Joseph S. and Robert O. Keohane, “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction,” International Organization 25, No. 3 (1971), 329-349.
Tallberg, Jonas, “Formal Leadership in Multilateral Negotiations: A Rational Institutionalist Theory,” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 1, No. 2 (2006), 117-141
