Backchanneling in LINE messaging application

Main Article Content

Siriporn Panyametheekul

Abstract

Back channel is an important tool that allows two people to understand the conversation better. When the communication happens via Line Application, the conversation cannot be heard or seen. Therefore, it is hard to interpret back channel messages and predict the feelings and emotions of the participants. This study analyzes the feelings corresponding to back channel in the conversation taking place in Line Application between two groups, namely the addresser and the addressee. The research results show that both groups show the same pattern in choosing back channel and perceiving the feelings attached to the messages. Back channels were divided into 3 groups: good, bad and neutral feelings. Good feelings include such words as “ja”, “kha”, “dai dai” and “ok” (only the addressee). Bad feelings include such words as “errr”, “um”, “uh” and neutral feelings include such words as “K”, “kk”, “ok” (only the addresser), “akre”, “kre kre”, “um” (with falling tone), “dai”, “deal” and “tamnan”. This research is useful for reducing the misunderstandings between two participants concerning back channels.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Panyametheekul, S. (2019). Backchanneling in LINE messaging application. VANNAVIDAS, 19(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.14456/vannavidas.2019.16
Section
Research article

References

นริศรา หาสนาม. (2558). ถ้อยคำแสดงการเป็นผู้ฟังของผู้ร่วมสนทนาที่มีสถานภาพเท่ากันในบทสนทนาภาษาไทย. (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาภาษาไทย.) จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, กรุงเทพฯ.

นววรรณ พันธุเมธา. (2544). คลังคำ. กรุงเทพมหานคร: อมรินทร์พริ้นติ้งแอนพับลิชชิ่ง.

ราชบัณฑิตยสถาน. (2562). พจนานุกรมไทย. สืบค้นจาก https://dictionary.sanook.com/search/dict-th-th-royal-institute/%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%94%E0%B9%89.

ศิริพร ปัญญาเมธีกุล. (มกราคม-มิถุนายน 2562). ความเข้าใจไม่ตรงกันในการสื่อสารผ่านแอปพลิเคชั่นไลน์. วารสารวจนะ, 7(1), 66-84.

Herring, Susan. (1999). Interaction Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.

Tao, H., & Thompson, S.A. (1991). English Backchannels in Mandarin Conversations: A Case Study of Superstratum Pragmatic ‘Interference’. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 209-233.

Xudong, Deng. (2009). Listener Response. In Sigurd D’hondt, Jan-Ola Östman, & Jef Verschueren (Eds.). The Pragmatics of Interaction (pp.104-124). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Yngve, V.H. (1970). On Getting a Word in Edgewise. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 567-577.