The language of threats in Thai: A Case Study of Interlocutors with Equal Status

Main Article Content

Prommin Prapaipong
Natthaporn Panpothong

Abstract

Threatening is a speech act which many speakers adopt to fulfill their needs. Meanwhile,
it might harm the relationship between interlocutors. This article aims at examining threatening strategies adopted by native speakers of Thai with equal status using the speech act theory and linguistic politeness as analytical frameworks. The data were collected in the form of written discourse completion tasks (WDCT) and in-depth interviews. The respondents are 230 native speakers of Thai. (200 for the WDCT and 30 for the in-depth interviews) The result shows that when Thai speakers decide to express threats, they prefer linguistic strategies which aim at the illocution rather than managing rapport. The strategies can be categorized into 3 groups including threatening or forcing the hearer (73.27%), expressing dissatisfaction (18.80%), and maintaining rapport between the speaker and hearer (7.93%). It is hypothesized that the notion of “face” and /Khwaam kreng jai/ (‘considerateness’) might be the related socio-cultural factors.

Article Details

How to Cite
Prapaipong, P., & Panpothong, N. . (2020). The language of threats in Thai: A Case Study of Interlocutors with Equal Status . VANNAVIDAS, 20(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.14456/vannavidas.2020.3
Section
Research article

References

พูนสวัสดิ์ สุขดี. (2548). รูปแบบของพฤติกรรมข่มขู่ และผลกระทบจากพฤติกรรมข่มขู่ ตามการรับรู้ของนักเรียนช่วงชั้นที่ 3 โรงเรียนในสังกัดเทศบาลนครขอนแก่น (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต). มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น, ขอนแก่น.

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. (2nd edition). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Bilmes, J. (2001). Sociolinguistic aspects of Thai politeness (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/33t5k8cw

Brown, P, & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universal in language usage. London,England: Cambridge University Press.

Fraser, B. (1975). Warning and threatening. Centrum, 3, 169-180.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London, England: Longman.

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: Or, Minding your P’s and Q’s. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 292-305.

Limberg, H. (2009). Impoliteness and threat responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1376-1394.

Klauser, W, J. (1981). Reflections on Thai culture. Bangkok, Thailand: Suksit Siam.

Komin, S. (1991). Psychology of Thai people: Values and behavioral patterns. Bangkok, Thailand: Research Center, National Institute of Development Administration.

Nicoloff, F. (1988). Threats and illocution, Journal of Pragmatics, 13, 501 - 522.

Persons, L. S. (2008). The anatomy of Thai face. MANUSAYA: Journal of Humanities, 11 (1), 53–75.

Searle, J. R. (1976). The classification of Illocutionary acts. Language in Society. 5, 1-24.

Ukosakul, M. (2003). Conceptual metaphors motivating the use of Thai ‘face’. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.