Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Thai EAP University Students: A Case of Electric Program Students in Different Majors

Main Article Content

Pattanon Phonhan
Sujittra Intharatsamee
Ratsawadee Belardo

Abstract

The research study aimed to investigate Thai higher education, Electric program students’ metacognitive reading strategies in case of different majors in the same field. The sample of the research consisted of 70 second-year electric program students ; 35 Electric Power Engineering students, and 35 Electrical Technical Education students. The research instrument was the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS), developed by Mokhtari & Sheorey (2001) which was applied for measuring the frequency of metacognitive awareness in reading academic texts. The data were analyzed by the package program in accordance with means, standard deviation, pos-hoc, and One-way ANOVA.
 
The findings of this study revealed that the problem-solving strategy group was the most frequently used whereas the support strategy was at the least when they read English academic materials. Furthermore, both academic programs in the same field had different statistical significance on global strategy. In conclusion, the difference for student’s using reading strategies depended on the nature of their majors.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phonhan, P., Intharatsamee, S., & Belardo, R. (2025). Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Thai EAP University Students: A Case of Electric Program Students in Different Majors. Journal of Education Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, 22(1), 10–18. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edu-rmu/article/view/276932
Section
Research Articles

References

Boyraz, S., & Altinsoy, E. (2017). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies in EFL Contexts. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(5), 159-167.

Chumworatayee, T. (2017). The Effect of Reading Strategy Instruction on Thai EFL Adult Learners’ Reading Strategy Awareness. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 10(1), 135-148.

Efklides, A. (2014). How does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? : An Integrative Approach. Psychological Topics, 23(1), 1-30.

Harish, S. (2014). Social Strategy Use and Language Learning Contexts : A Case Study of Malayalee Undergraduate Students in India. System, 43, 64-73.

Lukes, M. (2021). Metacognitive Strategies Used for Reading Comprehension among Adult Postsecondary Learners. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Walden University.

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2001). Differences in the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Native and Non-native Speakers. System, 29(4), 431-449.

Mokhtari, K.,& Reichard, C.A. (2002). Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.

Oxford, R. L. (1990) Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House Publications.

Oxford, R.L., & Leaver, B.L. (1996). A Synthesis of Strategy Instruction for Language Learners. In R.L Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross cultural Perspectives (pp. 227-246). Manoa : University of Hawaii Press.

Roomy, M., & Alhawsawi, S. (2019). Understanding Reading Strategies of EFL Saudi Students. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 33-44.

Thampradit, P. (2022). Models of Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness of Liberal Arts Students at King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Lardkrabang. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(5), 6569-6564.

Toomnan, P. (2022). Strategies in Reading Online Texts by Thai University Students. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 83-101.

Saricoban, A., & Behjoo, B.M. (2017). Metacognitive Awareness of Turkish EFL Learners on Reading Strategies. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 21(1), 159-172.

Suharni, T. (2017). The Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies by EFL Learners in Reading. Research in English Education, 2(1), 9-18.

Yuksel, I., & Yuksel, I. (2012). Metacognitive Awareness of Academic Reading Strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894-898.