CONFIRMATION AND HABIT OF USING E-GOVERNMENT MEDIATE BETWEEN QUALITY DIMENSIONS AND CONTINUANCE USAGE OF E-GOVERNMENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN THAILAND

Authors

  • Kittisak Jermsittiparsert College of Innovative Business and Accountancy, Dhurakij Pundit University
  • โกวิท วงศ์สุรวัฒน์ Faculty of Law, Assumption University

Keywords:

Confirmation, Habit, E-Government, Quality Dimensions, Continuance Usage

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to know the impact of system quality of e-government (SQEG), information quality of e-government (IQEG), service quality of e-government (SQG) on continuance usage of e-government (CUEG). The aim was also to know that how habit and confirmation mediate this relationship. This study has shown the significance of the successfulness of this operation introducing the government that SQEG is not compromising on IQEG and SQG on the usage based on trust and reliability. When the authors talk about mediating roles, the significance cannot be seen in between IQEG and CUEG. It has proven the detailed analysis that continuity will always depend on the quality which is provided by any system and not by IQEG.

References

Abelson, J., & Gauvin, F. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence and policy implications. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.

Abou-Shouk, M., & Khalifa, G. (2017). The influence of website quality dimensions on

e-purchasing behaviour and e-loyalty: a comparative study of Egyptian travel agents and hotels. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 608-623.

Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2012). A framework for evaluating citizens’ expectations and satisfaction toward continued intention to use e-government services. In H. Scholl, M. Janssen, M. Wimmer, C. Moe, & L. Flak. (eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7443, 273-286. Berlin: Springer.

Ayanso, A., Herath, T., & O'Brien, N. (2015). Understanding continuance intentions of physicians with electronic medical records (EMR): An expectancy-confirmation perspective. Decision Support Systems, 77, 112-122.

Bae, M. (2018). Understanding the effect of the discrepancy between sought and obtained gratification on social networking site users' satisfaction and continuance intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 137-153.

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Defining e-governance. e-Service Journal: A Journal of Electronic Services in the Public and Private Sectors, 8(2), 3-25.

Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information & Management, 51(6), 627-640.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.

Bhuiyan, S. (2011). Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 54-65.

Blut, M. (2016). E-service quality: development of a hierarchical model. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 500-517.

Cacciolatti, L., & Lee, S. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between marketing capabilities and firm performance: The moderating role of market orientation, marketing strategy and organisational power. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5597-5610.

Chen, L., Meservy, T., & Gillenson, M. (2012). Understanding information systems continuance for information-oriented mobile applications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30(1), 9. Doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03009

Chiu, C., Chiu, C., & Chang, H. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention. Information systems journal, 17(3), 271-287.

D'agostino, M., Schwester, R., Carrizales, T., & Melitski, J. (2011). A study of e-government and e-governance: An empirical examination of municipal websites. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 3-25.

Delone, W., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.

Godil, D., Sharif, A., Agha, H., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The Dynamic Nonlinear Influence of ICT, Financial Development, and Institutional Quality on CO2 Emission in Pakistan: New Insights from QARDL Approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 24190-24200.

Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2007). E-government success: some principles from a Spanish case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(6), 845-861.

Hong, S., Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2008). Antecedents of use-continuance in information systems: Toward an inegrative view. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 61-73.

Hsu, C., & Lin, J. (2015). What drives purchase intention for paid mobile apps?–An expectation confirmation model with perceived value. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(1), 46-57.

Jareonsubphayanont, N., & Narot, P. (2016). The E-government Situation in Thai Local Government: Municipalities in Khon Kaen Province. Journal of Mekong Societies, 12(1), 61-76.

Karahanna, E., Straub, D., & Chervany, N. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.

Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2019). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197.

Limayem, M., Hirt, S., & Chin, W. (2001). Intention does not always matter: the contingent role of habit on IT usage behavior. Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Global Co-operation in the New Millennium, Bled, Slovenia.

Limayenm, M., Hirt, S., & Cheung, C. (2003). Habit in the context of IS continuance: theory extension and scale development. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems 2003. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2003/90.

Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198-206.

Millard, J. (2008). eGovernment measurement for policy makers. European Journal of ePractice, 4, 19-32.

Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government information quarterly, 31(2), 211-220.

Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S., & Irani, Z. (2019). Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government information quarterly, 36(3), 536-545.

Nguyen, D. (2015). Understanding perceived enjoyment and continuance intention in mobile games. Master's thesis, Aalto University.

Omar, K., Scheepers, H., & Stockdale, R. (2011). eGovernment service quality assessed through the public value lens. In M. Janssen, H. Scholl, M. Wimmer, Y. Tan (eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6846, 431-440. Berlin: Springer.

Patrutiu-Baltes, L. (2016). Inbound Marketing-the most important digital marketing strategy. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Economic Sciences. Series V, 9(2), 61-68.

Pee, L., Jiang, J., & Klein, G. (2019). E-store loyalty: Longitudinal comparison of website usefulness and satisfaction. International Journal of Market Research, 61(2), 178-194.

Prabhu, C. (2013). E-governance: concepts and case studies. Delhi: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

Qutaishat, F. (2013). Users' perceptions towards website quality and its effect on intention to use e-government services in Jordan. International Business Research, 6(1), 97-105.

Rajput, A., Aharwal, R., Dubey, M., Saxena, S., & Raghuvanshi, M. (2011). J48 and JRIP rules for e-governance data. International Journal of Computer Science and Security, 5(2), 201-207.

Rey-Moreno, M., & Medina-Molina, C. (2017). Inhibitors of e-Government adoption: Determinants of habit and adoption intentions. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 172-180.

Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251-290.

Saengchai, S., Sriyakul, T., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The Impact of Citizen Trust, Citizen Disposition and Favourable Social Characteristics on the Adoption of e-Government: Mediating Roles of Perceived Behavioural Control. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(11), 375-393.

Sagarik, D., Chansukree, P., Cho, W., & Berman, E. (2018). E-government 4.0 in Thailand: The role of central agencies. Information Polity, 23(3), 343-353.

Santhanamery, T., & Ramayah, T. (2016). The effect of trust in the system and perceived risk in influencing continuance usage intention of an e-government system. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(3), 7-18.

Sriyakul, T. & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Role of E-Government and Open Data to Enhance Transparency in ASEAN Region: A Panel Data Analysis. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 10(O): 337-347.

Stefanovic, D., Marjanovic, U., Delić, M., Culibrk, D., & Lalic, B. (2016). Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. Information & Management, 53(6), 717-726.

Sung, Y., Liu, S., Liao, H., & Liu, C. (2009). Service quality between e-government users and administrators. I-WAYS, Digest of Electronic Commerce Policy and Regulation, 32(4), 241-248.

Suryanto, T., Setyohadi, D., & Faroqi, A. (2016). Analysis of the effect of information system quality to intention to reuse of employee management information system (Simpeg) based on information systems success model. MATEC Web of Conferences, 58(1):, 03001.

Tan, C., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. (2013). IT-mediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: An empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 77-109.

Teo, T., Srivastava, S., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of management information systems, 25(3), 99-132.

Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 15(1), 125-143.

Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. =(2018). What determines success of an e-government service? Validation of an integrative model of e-filing continuance usage. Government information quarterly, 35(2), 161-174.

Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2008). Understanding Citizen's Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 6(1), 55-64.

Yang, M., Shao, Z., Liu, Q., & Liu, C. (2017). Understanding the quality factors that influence the continuance intention of students toward participation in MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1195-1214.

Zheng, Y., Zhao, K., & Stylianou, A. (2013). The impacts of information quality and system quality on users' continuance intention in information-exchange virtual communities: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 56, 513-524.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Jermsittiparsert, K., & วงศ์สุรวัฒน์ โ. (2021). CONFIRMATION AND HABIT OF USING E-GOVERNMENT MEDIATE BETWEEN QUALITY DIMENSIONS AND CONTINUANCE USAGE OF E-GOVERNMENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN THAILAND. Humanities and Social Science Research Promotion Network Journal, 4(2), 116–136. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hsrnj/article/view/251892

Issue

Section

Research Articles