THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR, SOCIALIZATION AND GREEN BEHAVIOR: EMPLOYEES FROM LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THAILAND
Keywords:
Innovative Behavior, Socialization, Green Behavior, Logistics Service ProvidersAbstract
This research aims at studying and examining the relationship among innovative behavior, socialization and green behavior of employees from logistics service providers in Thailand. The samples were of 400 employees working in the logistics service providers. The questionnaire was administered to collect the data, using purposive and convenient sampling methods. Structural equation modeling was employed for data analysis. The result indicated that that innovative behavior positively influences socialization meanwhile socialization positively influences green behavior. Furthermore, innovative behavior positively influences green behavior. Lastly, socialization positively mediates the relationship between innovative behavior and green behavior at a significant level as of .001. The study can contribute to both practical and theoretical aspects influencing business performance.
References
Al-Hawari, M. A., Bani-Melhem, S., & Shamsudin, F. M. (2019). Determinants of frontline employee service innovative behavior: The moderating role of co-worker socializing and service climate. Management Research Review, 42(9), 1076-1094.
Ariyani, N., & Hidayati, S. (2018). Influence of transformational leadership and work engagement on innovative behavior. Etikonomi, 17(2), 275-284.
Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Rajiani, I., Rustiarini, N. W., Supartha, W. G., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2020). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation culture into SMEs sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(2), 405-428.
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25.
Asadi, S., Pourhashemi, S. O., Nilashi, M., Abdullah, R., Samad, S., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Razali, N. S. (2020). Investigating influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry. Journal of cleaner production, 258, 120860.
Atatsi, E. A., Stoffers, J., & Kil, A. (2019). Factors affecting employee performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(3), 329-351.
Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Machado, V. C. (2011). The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 850-871.
Boudreau, M. C., Chen, A., & Huber, M. (2008). Green IS: Building sustainable business practices. Information Systems: A Global Text, 1-17.
Chen, Y., Jiang, Y. J., Tang, G., & Cooke, F. L. (2018). High‐commitment work systems and middle managers' innovative behavior in the Chinese context: The moderating role of work‐life conflicts and work climate. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1317-1334.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
Cranmer, G. A., Goldman, Z. W., & Houghton, J. D. (2019). I’ll do it myself: Self-leadership, proactivity, and socialization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(6), 684-698.
Curran, P., West, S., & Finch, J. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29.
Dodsworth, A., & Honohan, I. (Eds.). (2022). Green politics and civic republicanism: Green republicanism as a response to the environmental and political crises of the 21st century. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Duradoni, M., & Di Fabio, A. (2019). Intrapreneurial self-capital and sustainable innovative behavior within organizations, Sustainability, 11(2), 322.
Ellis, A. M., Nifadkar, S. S., Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2017). Newcomer adjustment: Examining the role of managers’ perception of newcomer proactive behavior during organizational socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 993-1001.
Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Mena, J. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
Jokisaari, M., & Vuori, J. (2018). Leaders’ resources and newcomer socialization: the importance of delegation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(2), 161-175.
Jones, G. R. (1983). Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: An interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 464-474.
Katz-Gerro, T., Greenspan, I., Handy, F., & Vered, Y. (2020). Environmental behavior in three countries: The role of intergenerational transmission and domains of socialization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101343.
Kennedy, F. A., & Widener, S. K. (2019). Socialization mechanisms and goal congruence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 76, 32-49.
Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. London: Sage.
Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), rm1.1-17.
Kör, B., Wakkee, I., & van der Sijde, P. (2021). How to promote managers’ innovative behavior at work: Individual factors and perceptions. Technovation, 99, 102127.
Lee, L. Y., Veasna, S., & Wu, W. Y. (2013). The effects of social support and transformational leadership on expatriate adjustment and performance: The moderating roles of socialization experience and cultural intelligence. Career Development International, 18(4), 377-415.
Li, X., & Zheng, Y. (2014). The influential factors of employees’ innovative behavior and the management advices. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7(06), 446-450.
Luo, W., Tang, P., Jiang, L., & Su, M. M. (2020). Influencing mechanism of tourist social responsibility awareness on environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122565.
Madlock, P. E., & Chory, R. M. (2014). Socialization as a predictor of employee outcomes. Communication Studies, 65(1), 56-71.
Nishanthi, H. M., & Kailasapathy, P. (2018). Employee commitment: The role of organizational socialization and protean career orientation. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(1), 1-27.
Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49-54.
Onputtha, S., & Siriwichai, C. (2021). The impact of green corporate identity and green personal-social identification on green business performance: A case study in Thailand. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 157-166.
Onputtha, S., Sriboonlue, U., & Sriboonlue, O. (2021). The role of knowledge transfer among creative behavior, green service behavior and environmental performance in Logistics Service Industry. Journal of Management Information and Decision Science, 24(4), 1-12.
Pengman, H., Melan, M., & Hanan, S. B. A. (2022). Logistics service providers' capabilities and roles of government towards cross border logistics performance between Thailand and Malaysia. ABAC Journal, 42(1), 202-221.
Perotti, S., Prataviera, L. B., & Melacini, M. (2022). Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1679-1694.
Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2020). Pro-environmental organizational culture: Its essence and a concept for its operationalization. Sustainability, 12(10), 4197.
Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.
Qi, L., Liu, B., Wei, X., & Hu, Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: Perceived organizational support as a mediator. PloS One, 14(2), e0212091.
Riaz, S., Xu, Y., & Hussain, S. (2018). Understanding employee innovative behavior and thriving at work: A Chinese perspective. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 46.
Sabbir, M. M., & Taufique, K. M. R. (2022). Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non‐cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 110-128.
Singh, P., Sahadev, S., Oates, C. J., & Alevizou, P. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective. Journal of Business Research, 115, 110-121.
Son, S. (2016). Facilitating employee socialization through mentoring relationships. Career Development International, 21(6), 554-570.
Song, Z., Chon, K., Ding, G., & Gu, C. (2015). Impact of organizational socialization tactics on newcomer job satisfaction and engagement: Core self-evaluations as moderators. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 180-189.
Sun, X. (2021). Employees’ innovative behavior in the workplace: A study of intellectual capital effect on the service-oriented companies in Thailand. Thammasat Review, 24(2), 112-132.
Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L., & Ullman, J. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson.
Taormina, R. J. (1999). Predicting employee commitment and satisfaction: The relative effects of socialization and demographics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(6), 1060-1076.
Tian, H., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2020). The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: the role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7341-7352.
Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795-821.
Van Maanen, J. and Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward of Theory of Organizational Socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209-264.
Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565-1578.
Wang, Z., Ren, S., Chadee, D., & Sun, C. (2021). The influence of exploitative leadership on hospitality employees’ green innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99, 103058.
Wang, Z., Ren, S., Chadee, D., Liu, M., & Cai, S. (2021). Team reflexivity and employee innovative behavior: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1619-1639.
Wu, J., Chen, D., Bian, Z., Shen, T., Zhang, W., & Cai, W. (2021). How does green training boost employee green creativity? A sequential mediation process model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5778.
Zhang, Y., Luo, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2019). How green human resource management can promote green employee behavior in China: A technology acceptance model perspective. Sustainability, 11(19), 5408.
Zhang, Y., Wu, J., & Fan, Y. (2022). The effect of perceived organizational support toward the environment on team green innovative behavior: Evidence from Chinese green factories. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(8), 2326-2341.
Zhou, F., & Wu, Y. J. (2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader-employee interaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 375-387.
Zhu, C., & Zhang, F. (2020). How does servant leadership fuel employee innovative behavior? A moderated mediation framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(3), 356-377.
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2012). Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1377-1394.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 บุบผา ฐานุตตมานนท์

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ ผู้เขียน
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความในวารสารเครือข่ายส่งเสริมการวิจัยทางมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์จะถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้น และไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ

