The Development Learning of English Vocabulary Retention by Using English Vocabulary Game for Students in Prathomsuksa 6

Main Article Content

Naphattarakarn Puyati
Surattana Adipat

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) to determine the effectiveness of a learning activity using English vocabulary games to promote retention learning vocabulary the efficiency criterion of 80/80. 2) study English vocabulary retention learning vocabulary of student by using  English vocabulary games 3) study the satisfaction of students toward the learning by using  English vocabulary games. The samples used in this research were 40 students in Prathomsuksa 6/3 studying in the second semester of the academic year 2022 at Duangkamol School, Pathum Thani Province, using the simple random sampling. The instrument used to gather the data were 1) lessons plan activity using English vocabulary games 2) learning activity using English vocabulary games and 3) Pretest and Post-test 4) the satisfaction assessment form of the students towards the learning activities using English vocabulary games. The data were analyzed by t-test (t-test for dependent samples), mean (ð‘ĨĖ…) and standard deviation (S.D.) The results of this research were 1) The average formative score was 84.12/86.08 which meets the set criterion (80/80). 2) The students who received the learning by using English vocabulary games had a statistically significant .05 higher scores on the post-test than before the study. 3) The students achieved retention a higher score in the posttest after two weeks than in the posttest significantly at level (ð‘ĨĖ… = 26.53), (S.D.) = 1.062 4) The students learning by using English vocabulary games satisfaction at higher level (ð‘ĨĖ… = 4.28)

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

āļāļĢāļĄāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢ āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢ. (2551). āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļŠāļđāļ•āļĢāđāļāļ™āļāļĨāļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™ āļžāļļāļ—āļ˜āļĻāļąāļāļĢāļēāļŠ 2551. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļŠāļļāļĄāļ™āļļāļĄāļŠāļŦāļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļāļĐāļ•āļĢāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāđ„āļ—āļĒ āļˆāļģāļāļąāļ”.

āļ˜āļđāļ›āļ—āļ­āļ‡ āļāļ§āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļŠāļ§āļēāļŠāļ”āļīāđŒ. (2559). 200 āļāļīāļˆāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļ­āļ™āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļ­āļąāļ‡āļāļĪāļĐ. (āļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ 2). āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļˆāļļāļŽāļēāļĨāļ‡āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ.

āļ āļ§āļīāļāļē āđ€āļĨāļēāļŦāđ„āļžāļ‘āļđāļĢāļĒāđŒ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļĄāļĨ āđ‚āļžāļ˜āļīāđ€āļĒāđ‡āļ™. (2561). āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āđ€āļĨāļ‚ 3 āļŦāļĨāļąāļ āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļšāļāļžāļĢāđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļ•āļīāļ›āļąāļāļāļē. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļŠāļ§āļ™āļ”āļļāļŠāļīāļ•, 14(2): 155-170.

āļĨāđ‰āļ§āļ™ āļŠāļēāļĒāļĒāļĻ āđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļąāļ‡āļ„āļ“āļē āļŠāļēāļĒāļĒāļĻ. (2538). “āđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™āļīāļ„āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē”. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļž: āļŠāļļāļ§āļĩāļĢāļīāļĒāļēāļŠāļēāļĨāđŒāļ™.

āļŠāļļāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāđŒ āļĄāļđāļĨāļ„āļģ āđāļĨāļ°āļ­āļĢāļ—āļąāļĒ āļĄāļđāļĨāļ„āļģ. (2560). 19 āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļīāļ”.āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļĄāļŦāļēāļ™āļ„āļĢ: āļ”āļ§āļ‡āļāļĄāļĨāļŠāļĄāļąāļĒ.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.