The Gamification of Learning: Behavior, Personality, and Learning Outcomes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to assist instructors in adopting gamification in their classrooms. While not everyone enjoys games, our research provides guidance on tailoring gamification to accommodate each learner's style. This is the first study of its kind to examine not only the behaviors and personalities of game players but also their learning outcomes. We analyzed data from surveys, Classcraft, and traditional assessment methods using various multivariate data analysis techniques. Four segments were identified: Oppo, Warrior, Commander, and Master. We recommend evaluating these segments through different approaches. Unlike Oppo and Warrior, the Commander and Master segments can be assessed from multiple perspectives. Finally, ongoing assessments of the Oppo and Master segments are advisable throughout the learning courses.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ลิขสิทธิ์ของบทความ
ผลงานที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทย ห้ามมิให้นำเนื้อหา ทัศนะ หรือข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ของผลงานไปทำซ้ำ ดัดแปลง หรือเผยแพร่ ไม่ว่าทั้งหมดหรือบางส่วนโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากมหาวิทยาลัยหอการค้าไทยก่อน
References
Andrias, R. (2019). User/player type in gamification. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 8(1.6), 89–94. DOI: 10.30534/ijatcse/2019/1481.62019
Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2014, October 19-20). Relating gaming habits with student performance in a gamified learning experience. In CHI PLAY '14: The annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 17-25). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2658537.2658692
Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1), 19.
Bean, A. (2015). Video gamers’ personas: A five factor study exploring personality elements of the video gamer [Doctoral dissertation, Pacifica Graduate Institute]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281832098_Video_Gamers'_ Personas_A_Five_Factor_ Study_Exploring_Personality_Elements_of_the_Video_Gamer
Bean, A., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2016). Video gamers and personality: A five-factor model to understand game playing style. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000025
Fantazir, K., & Bartley, M. (2021). Role-playing gamification technologies with adult learners. Imagining SoTL, 1(1), 3–24. DOI: 10.29173/isotl520
Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised NEO-Personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(6), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.577
Gao, M., Wang, J., & Yang, J. (2023). Research into the relationship between personality and behavior in video games, based on mining association rules. Mathematics, 11(3), 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030772
Goshevski, D., Veljanoska, J., & Hatziapostolou, T. (2017, September 20-23). A review of gamification platforms for higher education. In BCI '17: 8th Balkan conference in informatics (pp. 1-6). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3136273.3136299
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January 6-9). Does gamification work? -- A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE Computer Society. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hamari, J., & Tuunanen, J. (2014). Player types: A meta-synthesis. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1(2), 29-53. DOI: 10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13
Hodges, D., & Buckley, O. (2018). Deconstructing who you play: Character choice in online gaming. Entertainment Computing, 27, 170–178. DOI:10.1016/j.entcom.2018.06.002
Iverson, K. (2019). Gamification of the classroom: Seeking to improve student learning and engagement [Master’s thesis, Northwestern College]. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=education_masters
Jia, Y., Xu, B., Karanam, Y., & Voida, S. (2016, May 7-12). Personality-targeted gamification: A survey study on personality traits and motivational affordances. In CHI '16: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2001-2013). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858515
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
Jurado, F., & Rodríguez, P. (2021). The learning style of gamers: Exploring a multidimensional profile aimed at gamifying MOOCs. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Research anthology on developments in gamification and game-based learning (pp. 152-170). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-3710-0.ch008
Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Wiley.
Kapp, K. (2013). The gamification of learning and instruction fieldbook: Ideas into practice. Wiley.
Klock, A. C. T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M., & Hamari, J. (2020). Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 144. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102495
Konert, J., Göbel, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2013, October 3-4). Modeling the player, learner and personality: Independency of the models of Bartle, Kolb and NEO-FFI (Big 5) and the implications for game based learning. In 7th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 329-335). Porto, Portugal.
Lirola, M., & Daniel, A. (2018). Gamification and motivation in the EFL classroom: A survey-based study on the use of classcraft [Master’s thesis, The University of the Balearic Islands]. https://dspace.uib.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11201/150186/tfm_2017-18_MFPR_aml603_ 1936.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
Lopez, C. E., & Tucker, C. S. (2019). The effects of player type on performance: A gamification case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 91(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.005
Marczewski, A. (2015). Even ninja monkeys like to play: Gamification, game thinking and motivational design. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Mogavi, R. H., Deng, C., Hoffman, J., Haq, E., Gujar, S., Bucchiarone, A., & Hui, P. (2023, July 23-28). Your favorite gameplay speaks volumes about you: Predicting user behavior and hexad type. In X. Fang (Ed.), HCI in Games: 5th International Conference, HCI-Games 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023 (pp. 210-228). Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_17
Nacke, L. E., Bateman, C., & Mandryk, R. (2014). BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment Computing, 5(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.06.002
Orji, R., Mandryk, R. L., & Vassileva, J. (2017). Improving the efficacy of games for change using personalization models. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 24(5), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3119929
Orji, R., Tondello G. F., & Nacke, L. E. (2018, April 21 - 26). Personalizing persuasive strategies in gameful systems to gamification user types. In CHI '18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). Montreal QC Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174009
Parody, L., Santos, J., Trujillo-Cayado, L. A., & Ceballos, M. (2022). Gamification in engineering education: The use of classcraft platform to improve motivation and academic performance. Applied Sciences, 12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211832
Rivera-Trigueros, I., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2020). Conquering the iron throne: Using classcraft to foster students’ motivation in the EFL classroom. Teaching English with Technology, 20(4), 3–22. https://tewtjournal.org/volume-2020/issue-4/
Sanchez, E., Young, S., & Jouneau-Sion, C. (2017). Classcraft: From gamification to iudicization of classroom management. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9489-6
Schneider, M. O., Moriya, É. T. U., da Silva, A. V., & Néto, J. C. (2016, Sebtember 8-10). Analysis of player profiles in electronic games applying bartle’s taxonomy. In SBGames 2016 (pp. 8-10). São Paulo, Brazil. https://www.sbgames.org/sbgames2016/ downloads/ anais/157721.pdf
Stewart, B. (2011, September 1). Personality and play styles: A unified model. Game Developer. https://www.gamedeveloper.com /design/personality-and-play-styles-a-unified-model
Thomas, B. (2023). Using classcraft to impact academic achievement [Master’s thesis, California State University San Marcos]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12680/zp38wk99d
Tondello, G. F., Mora, A., & Nacke, L. E. (2017, October 15 - 18). Elements of gameful design emerging from user preferences. In CHI PLAY '17: The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 129-142). Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116627
Tondello, G. F., Wehbe, R. R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., & Nacke, L. E. (2016, October 16 - 19). The gamification user types hexad scale. In CHI PLAY '16: The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 229–243). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082
Tseng, F. (2011). Segmenting online gamers by motivation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7693-7897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.142
Winther, D. (2010). Blood, gold or marriage – What gets you going? A study of personality traits and in-game behavior. iSCHANNEL, 5(1), 33-39.
Witari, I., Anwar, K., & Arifani, Y. (2021, October 21). The effect of classcraft on enhancing grammar performance of adult learners. In the 1st UMGESHIC International Seminar on Health, Social Science and Humanities (pp. 108-121). Gresik, Indonesia. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.211020.019
Zhang, Q., Yu, L., & Yu, Z. (2021). A content analysis and meta-analysis on the effects of classcraft on gamification learning experiences in terms of learning achievement and motivation. Education Research International, 2021, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9429112
