Neoliberalism in Judgment: Analysis of Central Administrative Court's Judgment on Revocation of Luxury Condominium Construction Permit

Abstract

Neoliberal action through the cooperation of capitalists and the state, which is legally guaranteed, whether it is the conversion of state land rights or public land for capitalists to use. The creation of special economic zones to create exemptions and favorable conditions for capitalists has a clear and blatant character, which is different from the Ashton Asoke case, which the author finds interesting. It is an effort of the capitalists and the state that is more ingenious and tactic. This article analyzes the verdict by applying various social science concepts and theories, not limited to jurisprudence. It is a documented study and focuses on analyzing the character's discourse battles in Judgment as a parable rather than directly criticizing the judgment. It shows the efforts of capitalists to cooperate with the state in the pursuit of economic benefits through the use of "state power" or "de puissance publique" and attempts to assert the validity of the content and the process of exercising power through discourse contention "Legality" with the aim of winning the case and having the effect of the court's verdict to certify the legitimacy of the neoliberal action.