THE EFFECT OF MICE STANDARD ON HOTEL PERFORMANCE AND THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Authors

  • Kamonluk Phophan International College, Silpakorn University
  • Jantima Banjongprasert International College, Silpakorn University

Keywords:

MICE Standard, Organizational Structure, Hotel Performance, MICE Hotel

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the influence of the MICE standard on hotel performance by testing the mediating roles of organizational structure (mechanistic organization and organic organization). Data was collected from 416 hotel employees, ranging from implementers to top management, involved in the implementation of the MICE strategy in Thailand. The quantitative research method is used to validate the variables and test the hypotheses. The relationships were investigated by using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings indicate that the MICE standard positively relates to organizational structure. The results also demonstrate the positive relationship between organizational structure and hotel performance. However, the direct effect of the MICE standard on hotel performance is not found. As a result, organizational structure has a full mediator role in the relationships between MICE standards and hotel performance. These findings have important implications for research and practice in the MICE area.

References

Allen, R. S., & Helms, M. M. (2006). Linking strategic practices and organizational performance to Porter's generic strategies. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 433-454.

Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). Mechanistic and organic systems. Classics of organizational theory, 209-214.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 217-234.

Dubé, L., & Renaghan, L. M. (1999). Building Customer Loyalty— Guests' Perspectives on the Lodging Industry's Functional Best Practices (Part I). Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 78-88.

Fitz-Enz, J. (2010). The new HR analytics. American Management Association.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Jogaratnam, G., & Tse, E. C. Y. (2006). Entrepreneurial orientation and the structuring of organizations: performance evidence from the Asian hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(6), 454-468.

Kanten, P., Kanten, S., & Gurlek, M. (2015). The effects of organizational structures and learning organization on job embeddedness and individual adaptive performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1358-1366.

Maitha, O., & Wang'oe, R. (2013). The Effect of Formal Organizational Structures on Inter-organizational Networks: A study on OEMs in the forest technology industry of Northern Sweden. (Master's program in Business Development and Internationalisation, Umeå School of Business and Economics).

Mallén, F., Chiva, R., Alegre, J., & Guinot, J. (2016). Organicity and performance in excellent HRM organizations: the importance of organizational learning capability. Review of Managerial Science, 10(3), 463-485.

Murasiranwa, E., Nield, K., & Ball, S. (2010). Hotel Service Quality and Business Performance in five hotels belonging to a UK Hotel Chain. International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track, 11. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/CHRIE_2010/Wednesday/11

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Okumus, F., Altinay, L., & Chathoth, P. (2010). Strategic management in the international hospitality and tourism industry. Elsevier, Oxford.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4), 30-41.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.

Schaffer, J. D., & Litschert, R. J. (1990). Internal consistency between strategy and structure: Performance implications in the lodging industry. Hospitality Research Journal, 14(1), 35-53.

TCEB. (2015). 2015 Perspectives on MICE industry in ASEAN. MICE journal, 1, 7.

Tse, Y. K. (1991). Stock returns volatility in the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Japan and the World Economy, 3(3), 285-298.

Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 72-96.

Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Phophan, K., & Banjongprasert, J. (2021). THE EFFECT OF MICE STANDARD ON HOTEL PERFORMANCE AND THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE. Humanities and Social Science Research Promotion Network Journal, 4(3), 62–78. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hsrnj/article/view/253662

Issue

Section

Research Articles