Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics
The ethics guidelines for this journal are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. More detailed information on publication ethics is available on the COPE website: https://publicationethics.org/.

Duties of the Editor in Chief and Editors
   Fair Evaluation: Manuscripts are reviewed based solely on their intellectual content, regardless of the authors' gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy.
   Confidentiality: The Senior Editor, editors, and editorial staff must keep all information regarding a submitted manuscript confidential, sharing it only with the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisers, and the publisher when necessary.
   Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the explicit written permission of the author(s).
   Publication Decisions: The journal's handling Editor is responsible for making publication decisions based on the manuscript’s quality and relevance to the journal. They may consult with other editors, reviewers, and legal guidelines (e.g., on plagiarism and copyright).

Duties of Authors
   Reporting Standards: Authors must present accurate accounts of the research performed and provide an objective discussion of its significance. Data should be presented clearly, allowing others to replicate the work. Any false or misleading information is unethical and unacceptable.
   Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their work is original and properly cites or quotes the work of others where applicable.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Authors should not submit the same research to multiple journals or publish it in multiple venues. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple outlets is considered unethical.
   Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper citation of all referenced work is required. Influential publications should be cited appropriately.
   Authorship: Authorship should include those who made significant contributions to the research. All co-authors should approve the final manuscript and agree to its submission. Contributions from others should be recognized in the acknowledgments.
   Hazards and Subjects: Authors must identify any potential hazards involved in their research, whether related to chemicals, equipment, or human and animal subjects.
   Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: All authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may affect the results or interpretation of the work. Funding sources must also be disclosed.
   Errors in Published Works: If an author finds a significant error in their published work, they must promptly inform the Senior Editor or publisher to issue a retraction or correction.

Duties of Peer Reviewers
   Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer reviewers assist editors in making publication decisions and, through feedback, help authors improve their manuscripts.
   Promptness: If a reviewer is unqualified to evaluate the manuscript or cannot provide a timely review, they should notify the editor immediately.
   Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential and not shared with others without permission.
   Objectivity: Reviews must be objective, and personal criticism of authors is not acceptable. Reviewers should support their evaluations with reasoned arguments.
   Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers should identify any work not properly cited by the authors and inform the editor of any substantial similarities between the manuscript under review and other published work.
   Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must keep privileged information obtained through peer review confidential and not use it for personal gain. They should not review manuscripts where conflicts of interest may exist due to competitive or collaborative relationships.

Publication Malpractice Statement
JBER maintains a zero-tolerance policy regarding publication malpractice, adhering to the highest ethical standards. The following principles guide the journal's stance on malpractice:
   Plagiarism: JBER strongly opposes plagiarism in all forms. Any instances of plagiarism will result in immediate rejection of the manuscript and corrective measures.
Fabrication and Falsification: The journal prohibits any fabrication or falsification of data or research results. Authors must present reliable and accurate data, and any manipulation or misrepresentation will be treated as a serious ethical violation.
   Multiple Submissions: JBER expects manuscripts to be unique and not under review by other publications. Simultaneous submissions to multiple journals will result in rejection.
Authorship Disputes: Authorship must accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the research. Any disputes or misrepresentations must be resolved before submission, as i-ME values transparency in crediting contributors.
   Peer Review Integrity: Any attempts to manipulate the peer review process, such as coercing reviewers or submitting false recommendations, are strictly prohibited.
Retractions and Corrections: In the case of significant errors or misconduct, i-ME will issue retractions or corrections as necessary, following established ethical guidelines.
   Reporting Misconduct: JBER encourages reporting any suspected misconduct or ethical concerns regarding published articles. The journal is committed to investigating such reports and taking appropriate actions.

JBER is dedicated to maintaining the integrity of the publication process and promptly addressing any malpractice to ensure the highest standards of ethical conduct throughout all stages of publishing.