Development of Active Learning Management Platform Using Constructivism on the Topic of ICT System and Innovation for Educational Administration in Graduate Level
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research and development of educational innovations as well as the design of proactive learning management using creative cognitive processes are critical issues in the current situation. This research aimed to design and create, test, implement, and evaluate a prototype of an active learning management platform using constructivism on the topic of ICT System and Innovation for Educational Administration. This research is research and development. The target group studied by purposive sampling were the students in Master of Educational Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, for a total of 82 graduate students in year 2020. There are four steps in the research methodology: 1) user needs study and analysis; 2) platform design and development; 3) usability testing and evaluation; and 4) platform performance improvement.
The research results were as follows: 1) an active learning management platform using constructivism on the topic of ICT System and Innovation for Educational Administration uses database life cycle (DBLC) development process. Experimenting with the operational platforms for graduate learning involves learning alongside technology with a simple implementation. Students have a high level of satisfaction with the module prototype that is evolving and 2) the structure of this education platform consisted of a content web site, lecturer and students database, knowledge evaluation model, knowledge memorandum, web board, knowledge asset, document download and gallery. Therefore, the resulting module prototype provides students with practical skills in ICT learning and innovation for effective educational administration, including the development of skills in using digital platform for education as well.
Article Details
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารการศึกษาและนวัตกรรมการเรียนรู้ ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยหรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ และไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอกบทความเพื่อใช้ประโยชน์ทางวิชาการ แต่ให้อ้างอิงข้อมูลแสดงที่มาของบทความทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ประโยชน์
References
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the covid-19 pandemic: students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51. doi:10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
Ancelin-Bourguignon, A. (2019). The priming role of qualitative research in constructivist management control teaching. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 16(4), 463-490. doi:10.1108/QRAM-10-2017-0100Azorín, C. (2020). Beyond covid-19 supernova. Is another education coming?. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 381-390. doi:10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0019
Bell, R., & Liu, P. (2019). Educator challenges in the development and delivery of constructivist active and experiential entrepreneurship classrooms in Chinese vocational higher education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(2), 209-227. doi:10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0025
Chandra, Y. (2021). Online education during covid-19: perception of academic stress and emotional intelligence coping strategies among college students. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 229-238. doi:10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0097
Chapman, C., & Bell, I. (2020). Building back better education systems: equity and covid-19. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 227-236. doi:10.1108/JPCC-07-2020-0055
Dziubaniuk, O., & Nyholm, M. (2021). Constructivist approach in teaching sustainability and business ethics: a case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(1), 177-197. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-02-2020-0081
Hamdan, K. M., Al-Bashaireh, A. M., Zahran, Z., Al-Daghestani, A., AL-Habashneh, S., & Shaheen, A. M. (2021). University students’ interaction, internet self-efficacy, self-regulation and satisfaction with online education during pandemic crises of covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2). International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 713-725. doi:10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0513
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2018). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. (15th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Indochina.
Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2019). Higher education act B.E. 2019. Bangkok: Shipping and Parcel Printing Houses. [in Thai]
Panjarattanakorn, D., & Phakamach, P. (2020, February). The development of a learning management system platform for educational administration theory and innovation. Paper presented at The 4th National Conference on Education 2020, Nakhonratchasima, Thailand. [in Thai]
Phakamach, P. (2010). ICT system and modern management. Bangkok: Witty. [in Thai]
Phakamach, P., KaewPlang, S., & Soeikrathoke, P. (2013). Development of an interactive electronic book for ICT system and modern management. Journal of Information Science, 31(1), 25-43. [in Thai]
Pisanu, F. (2014). Educational innovation and technology. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics & Business, 14(2), 103-108. doi:10.15208/pieb.2014.12
Porcaro, D. (2011). Applying constructivism in instructivist learning cultures. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(1), 39-54. doi:10.1108/17504971111121919
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2020). Social isolation and acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of covid-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208. doi:10.1177/0735633120960421