Cognitive Dissonance and Teachers’ Adoption of Outcome- based Teaching

Main Article Content

Chantima Pathamathamakul

Abstract

This study presents the particular views of a small group of Thai university teachers about their adoption of Outcome-based Education (OBE) by using the theoretical lens of cognitive dissonance. This study was a qualitative research using an in-depth interview and a thematic content analysis. Nine participants were included based on the criteria of implementing constructive alignment at the classroom teaching level over the specified period. The results found teachers had dissonance as they experienced unwanted consequences related to students’ attitude of study-to-the-test and many technical and practical difficulties when using criterion-based scoring or rubrics. Teachers also had counter-attitudinal behavior of forced compliance with grading system based on the traditional time-based curriculum. The results indicated that teachers’ beliefs towards OBE in the transformational approach reinforced the existence of dissonance. Although teachers justified their effort and commitment to change based on their own motivation, they reflected high expectation of the institutional level to sustain the OBE implementation. In such attempt, the institution needs to create a consonant state between teachers’ conceptions and practices that fully addressed the key principles of OBE at the level of curriculum and policy-driven environment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pathamathamakul, C. (2022). Cognitive Dissonance and Teachers’ Adoption of Outcome- based Teaching. Journal of Education and Innovative Learning, 2(1), 15–34. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jeil/article/view/255602
Section
Research Articles

References

Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theory of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. (5-27). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Bohlmann, N., & Weinstein, R. S. (2013). Classroom context, Teacher expectations and Cognitive Level: Predicting childrenís maths ability judgements. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34, 288-298.

Brady, L. (1994). Outcome based education: resurrecting the objectives debate. New Education, 16(2), 69-75.

Braaten, M., Granados, E., & Bradford, C. (2022). Making sense through dissonance during preservice teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103541. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103541

Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229-266. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60121-5

Cumming, A., & Ross, M. (2007). The tuning project for medicine-learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 636-641. doi:10.1080/01421590701721721.

Delaney, K. K. (2015). Dissonance for understanding: Exploring a new theoretical lens for understanding teacher identity formation in borderlands of practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(4), 374-389. doi:10.1177/1463949115616326

Donnelly, K. (2007). Australia's adoption of outcomes based education: a critique. Issues in educational research, 17(2), 183-206.

Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan

Eren, A. (2010). Consonance and dissonance between Turkish prospective teachersí values and practices: Conceptions about teaching, learning, and assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 27-48.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Frank, J. R., & Danoff, D. (2007). The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 642-647. doi:10.1080/01421590701746983.

Gutierez, S. B. (2020). Collaborative lesson planning as a positive ëdissonanceíto the teachersí individual planning practices: characterizing the features through reflections-on-action. Teacher Development, 25(1), 37-52. doi:10.1080/13664530.2020.1856177

Harden, R. M. (2002). Developments in outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 117-120.

Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2009). Action-based model of dissonance: A review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (119-166). Elsevier Academic Press.

Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Levy, N. (2015). An action-based model of cognitive-dissonance processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 184-189.

Henderson, C., & Dancy, M.H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102

Hinojosa, A. S., Gardner, W. L., Walker, H. J., Cogliser, C., & Gullifor, D. (2017). A review of cognitive

dissonance theory in management research: Opportunities for further development. Journal of Management, 43(1), 170-199.

Ince, A. (2016). Managing risk in complex adult professional learning: the facilitatorís role. Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 194-211. doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1164743

James, M., & McCormick, R. (2009). Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 973-982.

Klongvessa, N. (2011). Outcome-based curriculum and alteration in landscape architecture lesson plan. Paper presented at IFLA APR Symposium on Landscape Architecture Education, Putra, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.land.arch.chula.ac.th/data/file_20110404172156.pdf

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2015). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Meyer, J. H. F. (2000). The modelling of ëdissonantí study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(1), 5-18. doi:10.1007/BF03173163

Morcke, A. M., Dornan, T., & Eika, B. (2013). Outcome (competency) based education: an exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(4), 851-863.

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pinit, P., Anmanatrakul, A., & Meearsa, J. (2020). Outcomes-based grading in an outcomes-based education. Walailak Journal of Learning Innovations, 6(2), 59-96.

Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Yl‰nne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 49-61. doi:10.1080/03075070701794809

Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 37-48. doi:10.1080/03075070309299

Ros·rio, P., N˙Òez, J. C., Ferrando, P. J., Paiva, M. O., LourenÁo, A., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2013). The relationship between approaches to teaching and approaches to studying: A two-level structural equation model for biology achievement in high school. Metacognition and learning, 8(1), 47-77. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9095-6

Spady, W. G., & Marshall, K. (1991). Beyond traditional outcome-based education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 67-72.

Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Swain, M. S., Gliedt, J. A., de Luca, K., Newell, D., & Holmes, M. (2021). Chiropractic studentsí cognitive dissonance to statements about professional identity, role, setting and future: international perspectives from a secondary analysis of pooled data. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12998-021-00365-6

Tamronglak, A. (2020) Impacts of the Thailand qualification framework-public administration on public administration education in Thailand. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(3), 276-290. doi:10.1080/15236803.2020.1771991

Treacy, M., & Leavy, A. (2021). Student voice and its role in creating cognitive dissonance: The neglected narrative in teacher professional development. Professional Development in Education, 1-20. doi:10.1080/19415257.2021.1876147

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.