Efficiency in Learning Computer Programming Course via Online Channels
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to study 1) efficiency of online teaching methods prepared with a prerecorded video and live online session; 2) received online learning quality in a computer programming course; and 3) student feedbacks and recommendations to develop more effective teaching strategies. Samples were 15 first year students in academic year 2020 registered in the EGCO111 Computer Programming course. Data was gathered by questionnaire with a confidence value of 0.83, analyzed by mean and standard deviation of feedback. Results were tabulated in three categories: 1) online teaching methods prepared in a prerecorded video and live online session required homework assignments after each class meeting to help students understand content better, despite the obstacle of poor internet connections potentially interfering with study; 2) online teaching method quality for EGCO111 Computer Programming was moderate because each student’s basic knowledge was not standardized, so individuals required guidance and suggestions for studying and exercises to fully understand content; and 3) online teaching methods with a prerecorded video (asynchronous learning) and live online session (synchronous learning) added to student knowledge and understanding of course content, which is necessary before live class sessions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารการศึกษาและนวัตกรรมการเรียนรู้ ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยหรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ และไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอกบทความเพื่อใช้ประโยชน์ทางวิชาการ แต่ให้อ้างอิงข้อมูลแสดงที่มาของบทความทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ประโยชน์
References
Hongsamad, Y., & Limtasiri, O. (2021). The comparison of academic achievement and satisfaction on solution topic of Mathayomsuksa 2 students between the online learning by google classroom and traditional method. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 5(2), 355-370. [in Thai]
Iramaneerat, C. (2020). Recommendation for managing online teaching and learning. Retrieved form http://www.cotmes.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/682_Online-teaching-รศ.ดร.นพ.เชิดศักดิ์-ไอรมณีรัตน์.pdf [[in Thai]
Kaosaiyaporn, O., Atisap, W., & Pochanukul, W. (2014). Development of integrated online course to enhance cooperative learning and inquiry skills for graduate student. Journal of Technical Education Development, 91(4), 34-42. [in Thai]
Laohacharassang, T. (2002). Designing e-Learning. Bangkok: Aroonprinting. [in Thai]
Ruayjinda, P., & Ekbovonwong, D. (2020). The comparison of attitudes towards online learning via video and live broadcasting of fourth year medical students at Medical Education Center, Surat Thani Hospital. An Online Journal of Education, 15(2), 1-12. [in Thai]
Sukanin, S., & Wongpanich, K. (2003). Open world e-learning: teaching on the internet. Bangkok, Thailand: SE-Education. [in Thai]
Thepvichit, A. (2009). Manual of moodle training for admin. Bangkok, Thailand: CEIT Suranaree University of Technology. [in Thai]
Thongkam, P. (1996). Educational measuring instuments. Pattani, Thailand: Faculty of Education, Prince of Songkla University. [in Thai]
Watanakanjana, C., Trichan, P., Puapornpong, T., & Rittiboonchai, W. (2021). Effectiveness of online-learning of lecturerís competence and assessment: a case study of Faculty of Management Science, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University. Social Science Journal of Prachachuen Research Network, 3(2), 1-13. [in Thai]
World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) WHO Thailand Situation Report. Retrieved from https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/searo/thailand/who-thailand-situation-report---18.pdf?sfvrsn=c5eced97_0