The Development of Research Based Learning Training Curriculum to Adjust Analytical Thinking Paradigm of Teachers in Phanomsarakham Technical College, Chachoengsao Province
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to: 1) develop and examine the efficiency of the research-based learning training curriculum; and 2) evaluate the use of this training curriculum. The key informants were 48 teachers of Phanomsarakham Technical College. The research instruments were: 1) training curriculum 2) questionnaire 3) pretest and posttest of the training program 4) self-assessment form 5) opinion questionnaire 6) behavior assessment and 7) analytical thinking assessment. Data analysis was percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test dependent. The results of this research indicated that: the current situation of research-based training program was at a moderate level and needs for training was at a high level, the efficiency of the training curriculum in the first test E1/E2 = 82.67/82.23 and in the second test E1/E2 = 81.78/82.97 which were higher than the criteria 80/80. The evaluation of the training program showed that the achievement of the trainees was higher before joining the training at a significant difference of 0.01, the self-assessment of the trainees was at the highest level, the opinion of the trainees was at the highest level, the behavior assessment of the trainees was at the highest level, and the analytical thinking assessment of the trainees was at a good level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารการศึกษาและนวัตกรรมการเรียนรู้ ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยหรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ และไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอกบทความเพื่อใช้ประโยชน์ทางวิชาการ แต่ให้อ้างอิงข้อมูลแสดงที่มาของบทความทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ประโยชน์
References
Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Bemont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hastings, J. T. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bureau of Educational Innovation Development. (2011). Approaches to learning management by students using a research process to learn. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the Basic Education Commission. [in Thai]
Chaijirachayakul, T. (2012). Compilation of courses on curriculum development and teaching science (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Sukhothai Thammathirat University Printing Press. [in Thai]
Gerdruang, A., & Khamchoo, C. (2021). Knowledge and analytical thinking behavior of students in the research methodology in public administration. Journal of MCU Ubon Review, 6(1), 537-548. [in Thai]
Henson, K. T. (2001). Curriculum planning: integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kammanee, T. (2017). Pedagogical science: knowledge for effective learning process management (21th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Kitreerawutiwong, N., & Kitreerawutiwong, K. (2021). Research based learning: implementing in higher education for health science education. Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Uttaradit Journal, 13(2), 287-302. [in Thai]
Lincharoen, A. (2016). The teacher development model for research based learning Instruction. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 9(1), 120-136. [in Thai]
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objective. Experts in assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Nikolova Eddins, S. G., & Williams, D. F. (1997). Based learning for undergraduates: a model for merger of research and undergraduate education. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(3), 77-94.
Patpol, M. (2013). A training curriculum development to enhance research-based instruction for teachers. Journal of Research and Curriculum Development, 3(1), 15-27. [in Thai]
Patpol, M. (2018). Assessment of curriculum for learning and development (4th ed.). Bangkok: Charansanitwong printing. [in Thai]
Petchklieng, F. (2017). The effects of the use of research based Learning model in a course of education for sustainable development. Elementary Education Program Faculty of Education, Bansomdejjaopraya Rajabhat University. Retrieved from http://www.bsru.ac.th/identity/ [in Thai]
Poolkrachang, A. (2018). Research-based learning. Bangkok: Bureau of Vocational Education Research and Development, Office of the Vocational Education Commission. [in Thai]
Saylor, J. G., & Alexander. W. M. (1974). Planning curriculum for schools. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Sinlarat, P., Khamdit, S., Manusate, C., Writtapa, W., & Misaen, N. (2018). Thai studies 4.0 philosophy of creative education and productivity (5th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]
Siritarungsri, P. (2014). Basic educational institution management model: research and development report. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. [in Thai]
Sroysing, K. (2021). The effects of research based learning in development of learning and innovation skills in the 21st century of hospitality industry students. Dusit Thani College Journal, 15(2), 381-396. [in Thai]
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York, NY: Guilford.
Tanner, D., & Tanner. L. (2007). Curriculum development theory into practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Teesuka, P., & Uamcharoen, S. (2015). The development of teaching model: curriculum development course by using research based learning approach for pre-service teachers. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 135-137. [in Thai]
Tyler, R. W. (1960). Basic principle of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.