Analysis of Administrative Factors Enhancing School Quality of Nawamintharachinuthit Triamudomsuksapattanakarn School
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research study was to analyze the administrative factors enhancing school quality of Nawamintharachinuthit Triamudomsuksapattanakarn School. The sample consisted of 350 educational stakeholders. A questionnaire with a reliability of 0.967 was used to collect data, which was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) by the first order CFA. Results of the assessment of the adequacy of the data used for the overall analysis Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) = 0.975. Bartlett’s test of sphericity with chi-squared (X2) = 15578.193, degrees of freedom (df) = 780, and p-value = 0.001. The research results found that there are four administrative factors that promote school quality. 1) Student quality development (STU): 14 variables, factor loadings 0.71-0.86, maximum factor loading = 0.86 was for promoting challenging learning experiences. 2) Educational leadership development (LEA): 9 variables, factor loadings 0.71-0.87, maximum factor loading = 0.87 was for motivating leaders, teachers, and staff. 3) Administrative quality development (ADM): 12 variables, factor loading 0.79-0.90, maximum factor loading = 0.90 was for establishing performance standards and continuous improvement. 4) Learning resources development (LER): 5 variables, factor loading 0.72-0.93, maximum factor loading = 0.93 was for building identity, trust, and cooperation with the community in developing learning resources. These findings provide insights into key components for improving school quality and can guide educational administrators' improvement efforts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The contents and data in published articles in the Journal of Education and Innovative Learning are considered the ideas and responsibility of the author(s). The Editorial team does not necessarily agree with any ideas or hold mutual responsibility of them. Plagiarism is not permitted, even for academic purposes. However, proper citation must be given whenever referencing the articles.
References
Charoenkam, S. (2019). Management model to improve the quality of school, Prayamonthathurajsripijit, Bangbon District, Bangkok. Journal of Education Bangkokthonburi University, 7(2), 11-24. https://journal.bkkthon.ac.th/upload/doc/spit/27/files/2.pdf [in Thai]
Chianchana, C. (2015). Using multivariate statistics for research: Designing, analyzing, and interpreting. 3 Lada. [in Thai]
Cisse, M., & Okato, T. (2009). The organizational strategies of school management in Japan: Focus on primary school principals. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(5), 39-50. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ895003
Daroonsin, M. (2013). The development of educational quality indicators of effective schools in communities under the jurisdiction of basic education commission [Doctor dissertation, Prince of Songkla University]. PSU Knowledge Bank. https://kb.psu.ac.th/psukb/handle/2010/9532 [in Thai]
Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2016). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED614324
Duangjit, K. (2016). The management by objectives process to promote research in classes of teachers Ban-pong-nok Chiangrai Primary Education Service Area Office 2 [Unpublished independent study]. Chiang Rai Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Huang, J., Tang, Y., He, W., & Li, Q. (2019). Singapore’s school excellence model and student learning: Evidence from PISA 2012 and TALIS 2013. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1575185
Kaiyawan, Y. (2020). Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis with AMOS (2nd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Printing House. [in Thai]
Kao-ian, J. (2014). Academic administration techniques in school (2nd ed.). Yala Rajabhat University Publishing. [in Thai]
Kenaphoom, S. (2019). Principle and approach of academic synthesis. Journal of Local Governance and Innovation, 3(2), 89-106. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLGISRRU/article/view/216449 [in Thai]
Koedphum, C. (2021). Policy proposals for administration of quality schools in Tambon Thapla District, Uttaradit Province under the Office of Uttaradit Primary Educational Service Area 2 [Unpublished independent study]. Uttaradit Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Lavonen, J. (2017). Governance decentralization in education: Finnish innovation in education. Revista de Education a Distancia, 53, 1-22. https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/290121
Local Community Development Institute. (2014). Reform the learning management system and education management. Sahamitr Printing. [in Thai]
Ministry of Education. (2023). Policy and focus of the ministry of education fiscal year B.E. 2567. https://www.moe.go.th/360policy-and-focus-moe-fiscal-year-2024 [in Thai]
New York City Department of Education. (2022). School quality expectations 2022-2023. https://infohub.nyced.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/school-quality-expectations-22-23.pdf
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2022, August 26). Guidelines for developing ‘quality schools’ in accordance with the Ministry of Education’s Policy. https://www.moe.go.th/360guidelines-developing-quality [in Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2017). The national scheme of education B.E. 2560-2579 (2017-2036). Prikwarn Graphic. [in Thai]
Ongart, B., Srisombat, K., & Chumpoophat, K. (2022). Composition of quality schools and factors affecting quality schools for small public educational establishments. Rajapark Journal, 16(46), 544-559. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJPJ/article/view/258863 [in Thai]
Pasunon, P. (2015). Validity of questionnaire for social science research. Journal of Social Sciences Srinakharinwirot University, 18, 375-396. https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/JOS/article/view/7044 [in Thai]
Phoket, T. (2021). The management model for development to quality schools of Ban Donyang School under the Chiangrai Primary Education Service Area Office 4. Journal of Buddhist Anthropology, 6(1), 34-51. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSBA/article/view/247097 [in Thai]
Phungmee, S., Panich, A., & Lenanant, A. (2021). The administration model development of quality schools in subdistrict under the Office of Prachuapkirikhan Service Area Office 1. Journal of Education Administration and Leadership Sakhon Nakhon Rajabhat University, 9(36), 61-71. https://jeal.snru.ac.th/ArticleView?ArticleID=965 [in Thai]
Rinthaisong, I. (2022). Structural equation modeling for behavioral and social sciences research (3rd ed.). Neo Point. [in Thai]
Secondary Educational Service Area Office Samut Prakan. (2024). Policy for developing educational quality. http://rpr.ac.th/news-detail__134620 [in Thai]
Sisan, B. (2017). Advanced research methodology in educational administration. Mean Service Supply. [in Thai]
Sridamrong, T. (2013). The school administration to be quality school: The grounded theory approach [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Udon Thanni Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Tamman, A. (2018). Quality school management model, Nong Khai primary education service area office 1 [Individual Study]. National Institute for Development of Teachers, Faculty Staff and Educational Personnel (NIDTEP). [in Thai]
