RESEARCH ON THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM OF MIDDLE MANAGERS IN CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES

Main Article Content

LiPing Zhu
Dr. Jinrong Kuang

Abstract

         First, the company will analyze the assessment status and determine the appropriate performance assessment method. Next, job descriptions for middle-level management positions such as general manager, deputy general manager and heads of departments will be established based on strategic development objectives, business objectives, specific business processes, and working characteristics of the enterprise. After analyzing each job position, specific assessment contents and key performance indicators will be established for each post. The weight factor method will then be used to assign the weight of each index, and finally, the specific performance appraisal table of each post will be formed. Specific performance appraisal standards will also be set for attitude and ability items. In order to ensure the accuracy of the performance appraisal results, the appropriate performance appraisal subject of Suzhou Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd. will be selected. Lastly, a performance appraisal result evaluation model will be designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the final performance appraisal results and determine the performance appraisal cycle.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zhu, L. ., & Kuang, D. J. . (2024). RESEARCH ON THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM OF MIDDLE MANAGERS IN CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES. Journal of Buddhist Education and Research, 9(4), 284–289. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jber/article/view/271715
Section
Research Article

References

Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business Press.

Hartmann, F. (1998). Accounting for performance evaluation: effects of uncertainty on the appropriateness of accounting performance measures. European Accounting Review, 7(3), 571-574.

Libby, T., Salterio, S. E., & Webb, A. (2004). The balanced scorecard: The effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1075-1094.

Maltz, A. C., Shenhar, A. J., & Reilly, R. R. (2003). Beyond the balanced scorecard:: Refining the search for organizational success measures. Long range planning, 36(2), 187-204.

Mendes, P., Santos, A. C., Perna, F., & Teixeira, M. R. (2012). The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 20-29.

Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel psychology, 53(3), 703-740.

Veen-Dirks, P., & Wijn, M. (2002). Strategic control: meshing critical success factors with the balanced scorecard. Long range planning, 35(4), 407-427.