Effectiveness of Work-Integrated Learning Model: Case Study on Project Formulation and Policy Analysis Course
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
For teaching and learning at present, it cannot focus solely on a lecture in class. Especially, learners who study public administration have one of the ELOs in producing leadership. The objectives of this study was to study the effectiveness of the application of Work-Integrated Learning Model in subject Project Formulation and Policy Analysis for the 3rd year students in Public Administration program. The instructor assigned the learners to learn from the project, there were ideas and needs in common with the community, which aims to enable learners to integrate academic services into teaching and learning effectively and able to respond the project in accordance with the needs of the community/society. The instructor designed teaching method over a period of 15 weeks, which can be divided into 3 steps: 1) project preparation 2) project approval and 3) project management. This research was a qualitative research. Data collection by using participant observation, semi-structured interview and focus group after the project to receive feedback (Reflection) then analyzed data by content analysis.
The findings revealed that the learner achievement when classifying learning according to Bloom’s Taxonomy guidelines, in cognitive domain, the learners could synthesize projects to the community. In psychomotor domain, the learners could invent a new projects to meet the needs of each community creatively. In affective domain, the learners responded to the project with a willingness and appreciation of helping the community. In social domain, the learners had developed communication, teamwork, management, and leadership that were aligned with CLO and ELO.
Article Details
เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ตีพิมพ์ในวารสารการศึกษาและนวัตกรรมการเรียนรู้ ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็นและความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน ซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยหรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ และไม่สงวนสิทธิ์การคัดลอกบทความเพื่อใช้ประโยชน์ทางวิชาการ แต่ให้อ้างอิงข้อมูลแสดงที่มาของบทความทุกครั้งที่นำไปใช้ประโยชน์
References
Adecco. (2020, November 5). 10 Skills for 2025. Retrieved from https://adecco.co.th/th/knowledge-center/detail/10-skills-for-2025 [in Thai]
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., & Pintrich, P., … Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: the cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Chaiyasain, C. (2019). Reflections from students on work integrated learning model with outcome-based education to linkage and support with life long learning skills: case study on “food and beverage operations and management course”. Joint international education conference: The 8th PSU education conference & 4th inspirational scholar symposium (ISS) 2019. Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. [in Thai]
Chandio, M. T., Pandhiani, S. M., & Iqbal, S. (2016). Bloom’s taxonomy: improving assessment and teaching-learning process. Journal of education and educational development, 3(2), 203-221. doi:10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1034
Churches, A. (2009). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Retrieved from http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom%27s+Digital+Taxonomy
Duzenli, T., Yilmaz, S., & Alpake, E. M. (2017). The effects of model making on design and learning in landscape architecture education. Eurasian journal of educational research, 70, 121-134. doi:10.14689/ejer.2017.70.7
Elmore, R. F. (2019). The future of learning and the future of assessment. ECNU review of education. 2(3), 328-341. doi:10.1177/2096531119878962
Kattiyaman, W., & Piyapimonsit, C. (n.d.) Improving Bloom’s educational aims. Retrieved from http://www.watpon.com.th [in Thai]
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
McLennan, B., & Keating, S. (2008, June). Work-integrated learning (WIL) in Australian universities: The challenges of mainstreaming WIL. Paper presented at the ALTC NAGCAS national symposium, Melbourne, Australia.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2020). 12th National economic and social development plan. Retrieved from http://www.nesdb.go.th [in Thai]
Orrell, J. (2011). Good practice report: work-integrated learning. Retrieved from https://ltr.edu.au/resources/GPR_Work_Integrated_Learning_Orrell_2011.pdf
Pinkesorn, K., Kittisaknawin, C., & Kongkla, C. (2017). Human capital: corporate human capital scorecard. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkron Rajabhat University, 11(2), 193-202. [in Thai]
Pradubwate, R. (2017). Technology learning management guidelines by using Bloom’s taxonomy. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 10(3), 1051-1065. [in Thai]
Sankaburanurax, A. (2016). Development of art-based teaching styles to promote creative work for undergraduate students (Doctoral dissertation). Silpakorn University. [in Thai]
Son, H. H. (2010). Human capital development. ADB economics working paper series No. 225. Manila: Asian Development Bank. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1695806
Wongthongdee, S. (2014). Human resource development (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn Press. [in Thai]
Yawai, A., Vongchavalitkul, N., Sattayanuchit, W., Tanaworakul, N., & Pattamawipak, A. (2019). Development of learners learning outcomes by the creating of learning condition in the real condition. (Research Report No. RDG6140038) Retrieved from Research on The Thailand Research Fund website: https://www.ubu.ac.th/web/files_up/00046f2019071017175859.pdf [in Thai]
Yoelao, D. (2014). PBL learning management from the construction project knowledge set to enhance the skills of the 21st century of children and youth: from the success experience of thai schools. Bangkok: Thiphayawisut Ltd., Part. [in Thai]