THE DEVELOPMENT OF PATTERNS AND PROCESSES OF THE INTEGRATED DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF THE SANGHA IN SURIN PROVINCE

Abstract

This research, entitled “The Development of Patterns and Processes of the Integrated Dispute Resolution of the Sangha in Surin Province,” aimed to:           (1) examine the current state of the dispute of the Sangha in Surin Province; (2) develop an integrated model and process for resolving such disputes; and (3) evaluate the developed model and process. The study employed a mixed-methods research design, combining qualitative research and Research and Development (R&D). Qualitative data were collected through documentary analysis, a review of relevant literature, and in-depth interviews. The findings were subsequently synthesized to develop and refine the proposed model.

1) The findings revealed that ecclesiastical disputes within the Sangha of Surin Province occur relatively infrequently. Most cases stem from monks’ failure to strictly observe the Buddhist monastic discipline (Vinaya). While many disputes can be resolved through established ecclesiastical procedures, more complex cases require integrated collaboration between the Sangha and state authorities.

2) The integrated model for resolving Sangha Adhikaraṇa consisted of adherence to the Vinaya and Buddhist principles, improvement of the Sangha administrative system, mediation and reconciliation, legal procedures, collaborative networks among temples, local communities, and government agencies, the application of digital technology for knowledge dissemination, and policy development. The operational process comprised preliminary problem analysis, appointment of an investigation committee, inquiry and mediation, adjudication based on the Vinaya and relevant laws, enforcement of decisions, follow-up and evaluation, and continuous systemic improvement.

(3) The evaluation of the developed model indicated that the overall appropriateness of the integrated model was rated at a high level ( 𝑥̄= 4.17, S.D. = 0.56), while the evaluation of the process dissemination was also at a high level ( 𝑥̄= 4.41, S.D. = 0.49). These findings demonstrate that the developed model and process are accurate, appropriate, and practically applicable. The integration of the disciplinary authorities (Phra Vinayadhikara) from both the Mahanikaya and Dhammayut orders, together with collaboration among government agencies and relevant stakeholders, significantly enhances the effectiveness of the Sangha's ecclesiastical dispute resolution system in a systematic, transparent, and sustainable manner.